Blond, Gouden Tripel, Speciale |
Blond) Blondes have more fun. I'm not so sure about blond beers yet though. The mouth feel was great, but the flavors are basically a Grain Belt with a bit more oomph. Yes, oomph is a technical term meaning "more robust." Please don't overthink it, like this beer. ☆☆☆
Gouden Tripel) A tripel is usually significantly stronger than a blond. However, this one was a 7.5% and the blond was a 6.6%. That's not a huge difference. That established, I could barely get at the flavors because of how strong the effervescence was. I let it warm up though, and it redeemed itself. Fitting, since the bottle says "serve between 8 to 12 degrees C," or in other words, serve at about room temperature. The more wine-like qualities came through as it warmed up. ☆☆☆
Speciale) also claimed it needed to be served warmer. Still, even with the right temperature, I found this one fairly bland. I think the Blond actually had more flavor than this one, even with the difference in flavor profiles. At most, this one had more of that hollow old-style ale touch in the background. ☆☆☆
My solution to these okay beers? Mix them all together! I expected the result to be terrible, but it was actually good. The result was smooth, and somehow contained the best attributes of all three. The Blond's grainy middle, the Tripel's winy finish, and the Speciale's background hollowness. I am not sure if I recommend the construction of intentional beer suicides though...
No comments:
Post a Comment